Publications related to 'uniqueness'
 
Order by:   Type | Year
           related to:
Associated keywords
2020
1
photophotophotophotophotophoto
Elizabeth Gross, Leo van Iersel, Remie Janssen, Mark Jones, Colby Long and Yukihiro Murakami. Distinguishing level-1 phylogenetic networks on the basis of data generated by Markov processes. 2020.  
Keywords: characterization, distinguishability, explicit network, galled tree, phylogenetic network, population genetics, semidirected network, statistical model, uniqueness.
Note: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.08782.
       

2
photophotophoto
Leo van Iersel, Vincent Moulton and Yukihiro Murakami. Reconstructibility of unrooted level-k phylogenetic networks from distances. In AAM, Vol. 120(102075):1-30, 2020.  
Keywords: from distances, galled tree, level k phylogenetic network, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, reconstruction, uniqueness.
Note: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aam.2020.102075.
       

3
photophoto
Simone Linz and Charles Semple. Caterpillars on three and four leaves are sufficient to reconstruct binary normal networks. In JOMB, 2020.  
Keywords: explicit network, from rooted trees, from triplets, normal network, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, reconstruction, uniqueness.
Note: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00483, to appear.
       

2019
4
photophotophotophotophoto
Yukihiro Murakami, Leo van Iersel, Remie Janssen, Mark Jones and Vincent Moulton. Reconstructing Tree-Child Networks from Reticulate-Edge-Deleted Subnetworks. In BMB, Vol. 81:3823-3863, 2019.  
Keywords: from subnetworks, level k phylogenetic network, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, reconstruction, tree-child network, uniqueness, valid network.
Note: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-019-00641-w.
       

5
photophotophoto
Péter L. Erdös, Leo van Iersel and Mark Jones. Not all phylogenetic networks are leaf-reconstructible. In JOMB, Vol. 79(5):1623-1638, 2019.  
Keywords: from subnetworks, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, reconstruction, uniqueness.
Note: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-019-01405-9.
       

2018
6
photophotophoto
Magnus Bordewich, Charles Semple and Nihan Tokac. Constructing tree-child networks from distance matrices. In Algorithmica, Vol. 80(8):2240-2259, 2018.  
Keywords: compressed network, explicit network, from distances, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, polynomial, reconstruction, tree-child network, uniqueness.
Note: http://www.math.canterbury.ac.nz/~c.semple/papers/BSN17.pdf.
       

7
photophoto
Leo van Iersel and Vincent Moulton. Leaf-reconstructibility of phylogenetic networks. In SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 32(3):2047-2066, 2018.  
Keywords: explicit network, from network, level k phylogenetic network, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, reconstruction, uniqueness.
Note: https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.08982.
       

8
photophoto
Andrew R. Francis and Vincent Moulton. Identifiability of tree-child phylogenetic networks under a probabilistic recombination-mutation model of evolution. In JTB, Vol. 446:160-167, 2018.  
Keywords: explicit network, from unrooted trees, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, tree-child network, uniqueness.
Note: https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.04223.
       

9
photophotophotophoto
Magnus Bordewich, Katharina Huber, Vincent Moulton and Charles Semple. Recovering normal networks from shortest inter-taxa distance information. In JOMB, Vol. 77(3):571-594, 2018.  
Keywords: explicit network, from distances, normal network, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, polynomial, reconstruction, uniqueness.
Note: http://www.math.canterbury.ac.nz/~c.semple/papers/BHMS18.pdf.
       

10
photophoto
Elizabeth Gross and Colby Long. Distinguishing Phylogenetic Networks. In SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry, Vol. 2(1):72-93, 2018.  
Keywords: distinguishability, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, semidirected network, statistical model, uniqueness.
Note: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03060.
       

11
photo
Guillaume Scholz. New algorithms and mathematical tools for phylogenetics beyond trees. PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, 2018.  
Keywords: circular split system, explicit network, explicit network, from splits, galled tree, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, polynomial, reconstruction, split network, uniqueness.
Note: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/66952.
       

2017
12
photophotophoto
Philippe Gambette, Katharina Huber and Steven Kelk. On the challenge of reconstructing level-1 phylogenetic networks from triplets and clusters. In JOMB, Vol. 74(7):1729-1751, 2017.  
Keywords: from clusters, from triplets, galled tree, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, reconstruction, uniqueness.
Note: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00285-016-1068-3.
       

13
photophotophoto
Philippe Gambette, Katharina Huber and Guillaume Scholz. Uprooted Phylogenetic Networks. In BMB, Vol. 79(9):2022-2048, 2017.  
Keywords: circular split system, explicit network, from splits, galled tree, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, polynomial, reconstruction, split network, uniqueness.
Note: http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.08387.
       

14
photophoto
Sha Zhu and James H. Degnan. Displayed Trees Do Not Determine Distinguishability Under the Network Multispecies Coalescent. In SB, Vol. 66(2):283-298, 2017.  
Keywords: branch length, coalescent, explicit network, from network, likelihood, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, Program Hybrid-coal, Program Hybrid-Lambda, Program PhyloNet, software, uniqueness.
Note: presentation available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLYGTfEZG7g.
       

15
photophoto
Gabriel Cardona and Joan Carles Pons. Reconstruction of LGT networks from tri-LGT-nets. In JOMB, Vol. 75(6-7):1669-1692, 2017.  
Keywords: explicit network, from subnetworks, from tri-LGT-nets, LGT network, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, reconstruction, uniqueness.
Note: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-017-1171-0.
       

2016
16
photophoto
Magnus Bordewich and Charles Semple. Determining phylogenetic networks from inter-taxa distances. In JOMB, Vol. 73(2):283-303, 2016.  
Keywords: from distances, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, reconstruction, reticulation-visible network, time consistent network, tree-child network, uniqueness.
Note: http://132.181.26.35/~c.semple/papers/BS15b.pdf.
       

2015
17
photophotophotophoto
Katharina Huber, Leo van Iersel, Vincent Moulton and Taoyang Wu. How much information is needed to infer reticulate evolutionary histories? In Systematic Biology, Vol. 64(1):102-111, 2015.  
Keywords: explicit network, from network, from rooted trees, from subnetworks, from trinets, identifiability, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, reconstruction, uniqueness.
Note: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu076.
       

2013
18
photophoto
Katharina Huber and Vincent Moulton. Encoding and Constructing 1-Nested Phylogenetic Networks with Trinets. In ALG, Vol. 66(3):714-738, 2013.  
Keywords: explicit network, from subnetworks, from trinets, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, reconstruction, uniqueness.
Note: http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.0728.
       
Toggle abstract
2012
19
photophoto
Philippe Gambette and Katharina Huber. On Encodings of Phylogenetic Networks of Bounded Level. In JOMB, Vol. 65(1):157-180, 2012.  
Keywords: characterization, explicit network, from clusters, from rooted trees, from triplets, galled tree, identifiability, level k phylogenetic network, phylogenetic network, uniqueness, weak hierarchy.
Note: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00609130/en/.
       
Toggle abstract
2010
20
photo
Pawel Górecki. H-trees: a model of evolutionary scenario with horizontal gene transfer. In Fundamenta Informaticae, Vol. 103:105-128, 2010.  
Keywords: duplication, lateral gene transfer, loss, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, uniqueness.
       

2009
21
photophotophoto
Leo van Iersel, Steven Kelk and Matthias Mnich. Uniqueness, intractability and exact algorithms: reflections on level-k phylogenetic networks. In JBCB, Vol. 7(4):597-623, 2009.  
Keywords: explicit network, from triplets, galled tree, level k phylogenetic network, NP complete, phylogenetic network, phylogeny, reconstruction, uniqueness.
Note: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0712.2932v2.